The History Forum
The History Forum .com - The historical discussion forum.
[ Register ][ Login ]
[ Forum Rules ][ F.A.Q. ][ Search ]
The History Forum » Special Content » Battleships » Royal Navy Battleship types
Royal Navy Battleship types
  NEW TOPIC      POST REPLY  
Log-in to remove advertisement.
18% Fossilised
User avatar
Joined: Sat 04 Jan 2003, 07:32
Posts: 361
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Wed 17 Jan 2007, 02:55
I have classified all the 20th Century battleships of the Royal Navy into sub-types on the battleships page.

Any mistakes/corrections/feedback?

I have listed them as:

Pre-Dreadnought
Dreadnought
Super-Dreadnought
Fast Battleship
Battle cruiser
Amphibious bombardment cruiser

The last one being the title I settled on for the unclassifiable Courageous class. For those that are not familiar, they were armoured more like light cruisers, armed like battleships, but had an insufficent number of guns for salvo fireing and so could not hit moving targets.
The History Forum
[]
Posted:
Battleship-Meister
User avatar
Joined: Sun 09 Mar 2003, 02:09
Posts: 624
PostPosted: Wed 17 Jan 2007, 21:44
I would subdivide battle cruiser into "Dreadnought battle cruiser" and "SuperDreadaught battle cruiser" as applicable.

It's interesting that for Germany you included the Duetchlands as "pocket battleships"- thought this is certainly correct, based on the scales we're using, they were really just heavy cruisers (I would just drop them from the list).

For the Kirovs, the "Super-sized missile cruiser" term sounds rather clumsy- or like a hamburger meal. Maybe just Missile battle cruiser?

Additionally, the first Super Dreadnaught was the Queen Elizabeth class, because they burned oil instead of coal, and used turbines. IIRC. According to Wiki I'm wrong, but that sounds fishy.
Image
18% Fossilised
User avatar
Joined: Sat 04 Jan 2003, 07:32
Posts: 361
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Thu 18 Jan 2007, 11:41
Mr Bill wrote:
I would subdivide battle cruiser into "Dreadnought battle cruiser" and "SuperDreadaught battle cruiser" as applicable.


Okay, I will do that (once "super-Dreadnought" has been sorted out (below)).

Mr Bill wrote:
It's interesting that for Germany you included the Duetchlands as "pocket battleships"- thought this is certainly correct, based on the scales we're using, they were really just heavy cruisers (I would just drop them from the list).


Yeah I know that they are not really battleships, but since the Graf Spee was such a famous ship (and is always referred to as a "Pocket Battleship" rather than heavy cruiser in popular history) I felt obliged to include them. I will make a definitions page for all the types once the list is completed to explain exactly what they really are.

Mr Bill wrote:
For the Kirovs, the "Super-sized missile cruiser" term sounds rather clumsy- or like a hamburger meal. Maybe just Missile battle cruiser?


Okay.

Mr Bill wrote:
Additionally, the first Super Dreadnaught was the Queen Elizabeth class, because they burned oil instead of coal, and used turbines. IIRC. According to Wiki I'm wrong, but that sounds fishy.


I was going by gun size greater than 12". Thus starting with the Orions (13.5"). They did use steam turbines (though they must have been coal fired). So basically it comes down to does being oil fired make a super-dreadnought? Or more complicated than that?
Battleship-Meister
User avatar
Joined: Sun 09 Mar 2003, 02:09
Posts: 624
PostPosted: Tue 19 Jun 2007, 14:20
Quote:
Dreadnought fast batteship
Scharnhorst 7 Jan 1939 Sunk at North Cape, 26 Dec 1943 Dreadnought fast batteship

Bismarck class
Bismarck 24 Aug 1940 Sunk in the Atlantic, 27 May 1941 Super-Dreadnought fast batteship
Tirpitz 25 Feb 1941 Sunk by aircraft, 12 Nov 1944 Super-Dreadnought fast batteship


Spelling errors.
Image
18% Fossilised
User avatar
Joined: Sat 04 Jan 2003, 07:32
Posts: 361
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Mon 25 Jun 2007, 15:41
Heh, one typo copy/pasted several times.

Corrected. Thank you.
I'm new (say hi & be nice to me!)
User avatar
Joined: Mon 14 Jun 2010, 01:09
Posts: 13
PostPosted: Mon 14 Jun 2010, 01:18
With the Deutschlands, the Germans never referred to them as 'battleships' of any type. They referred to them as 'Armoured Ships' more in line as fast pre-dreadnoughts.

Sorry but whoever put this description doesnt know their ships too well.....
"Lord Nelson class - The Lord Nelson class carried the heaviest secondary armament of any Pre-Dreadnought, ten 9.2-inch guns. "
the Satsuma's carried 12x10", which I figure is slightly better than 10x9.2"
I'm new (say hi & be nice to me!)
User avatar
Joined: Mon 14 Jun 2010, 01:09
Posts: 13
PostPosted: Mon 14 Jun 2010, 17:56
Howdy,
I was thinking about the 'Amphibious Bombardment Cruiser' designation.
The originals of this type of vessel were designated 'Bomb Ketch' in the late 1700's and were armed with two large 'mortars' for land bombardment. The lineage of these vessels culminated in the 'Monitor' type vessels the last of which were Abercrombie and Roberts of 1943.
So in keeping with your other descriptions, The Courageous Class could be described as 'Super Dreadnought Monitors' which would be a much nearer classification.
Always interesting to follow where the warship classifications originated from.
'Corvette' type vessels were a French designation for sailing ships between sloop and frigate which made them both gracefull, speedy and well armed vessels for their size. I dont think any of the WW2 Corvettes matched that description at all. I figure the original sailing ships were probably faster and more comfortable to sail in than the UK Gladiolous type too!!
18% Fossilised
User avatar
Joined: Sat 04 Jan 2003, 07:32
Posts: 361
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Tue 15 Jun 2010, 14:38
I'm aware of the Deutschland's not being battleships. They are really only there because they have been labeled battleships in the popular media.

[Edit: I see now this was a reference to the word "panzerschiff". I've edited the "battleship types" page accordingly.]

NigeVids wrote:
Sorry but whoever put this description doesnt know their ships too well.....
"Lord Nelson class - The Lord Nelson class carried the heaviest secondary armament of any Pre-Dreadnought, ten 9.2-inch guns. "
the Satsuma's carried 12x10", which I figure is slightly better than 10x9.2"


My source for that was Jane's Battleships of the 20th Century 1st ed., pp.99. Being Jane's I didn't bother to cross check, but you are of course correct. I'll see about changing that.

I admit that "Amphibious Bombardment Cruiser" is a horribly clumsy designation, if rather matter-of-fact. Re-designating them monitors sounds like a good idea, since shallow-draft was also a design consideration.

Cheers NigeVids.
Log-in to remove advertisement.
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
  NEW TOPIC      POST REPLY  
The History Forum » Special Content » Battleships » Royal Navy Battleship types
cron
More Forums: [ Politics Forum ][ UK Politics Forum ][ U.S.S.R. ]
[ Top ]
Copyright © 2004-2010 Siberian Fox network. Powered by phpBB.